Gigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H-B3

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H-B3 (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120327
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '18 at 15:49
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 170 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 332 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Gigabyte(1458 226C) CLim: 1035 MHz, MLim: 1480 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Lighting 36.2 Reflection 32.8 Parallax 43.6 30% 37.5 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 30.7 Splatting 38.1 27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 120GB 4,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 32GB free Firmware: SAFM22.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4424 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 449 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 198 (AD) Unknown 100 100 655379 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 94 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1089	42% Average	Read 325 Write 238 Mixed 175 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 5.96 45% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 40.7 DQ Mixed 6.75 12% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 234690450 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13512 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 136 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 393871517 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19718 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 6055 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 55835427254 (BD) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BE) vendor-specific 71 48 504234013 (C2) HDA temperature 29 52 17179869213 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 24 234690450 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 17776869664353 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1456726313 (F2) Unknown 100 253 321441841	64.2% Good	Read 113 Write 110 Mixed 31.7 62% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.54 109% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 145GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 120 120 12897419455 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2736 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11385 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1856 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2833 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2833 (C2) HDA temperature 240 240 210453594137 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	78.1% Very good	Read 141 Write 131 Mixed 18 70% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.2 83% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H67M-UD2H-B3 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67M-UD2H-B3

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	8x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	7x
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	4x

SSD
750 EVO 120GBSamsung $35Bench 93%, 20,420 samples	3x
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	9x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	8x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $344

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16