Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z170-HD3P
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170630
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '18 at 20:21
Run Duration	426 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 125 2-Core 221 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 642 64% 523 Pts	64-Core 660 41% 660 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.6% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 110 104% 89.3 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 27.4 Splatting 102 67% 79.8 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 344GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2545 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 269 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 57 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 45 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12657103318	109% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 393 Mixed 418 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 46 167% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 125 142% 243 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 694GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698550 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3481 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9264 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 930 (C0) Power-off retract count 89 89 14378 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 14378 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 176094707743 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	74.5% Very good	Read 121 Write 139 Mixed 142 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.15 55% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 107%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB 13,827 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 137 Write 108 Mixed 92.1 137% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.28 54% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 100%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 95.6 Write 81.1 Mixed 52.8 93% 76.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.22 63% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	6.18% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 3.74 Mixed 6.41 10% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.89 4K Write 0.45 4K Mixed 0.34 41% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-2400 01BA 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 04EF Team-Elite-2400 01BA 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	81% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 25.2 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 25.3 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z170-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 2,519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - $113

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	810x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	551x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	302x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	272x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	262x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	239x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	145x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	76x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	55x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	103x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	89x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	75x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $552

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16