Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '18 at 22:09
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102 38,959 User benchmarks, average bench 65% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 117 2-Core 235 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 419 52% 396 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22FF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.51% Terrible	Lighting 5.63 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 6.94 5% 6.04 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 5.43 Splatting 5.43 4% 5.29 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 4.51% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 21272763 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 118103010726430 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2353 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 616 (B1) Unknown 0 0 95 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 52 1013615689754 (C2) HDA temperature 26 52 1013615689754 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21272763 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21272763 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21272763 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 91 91 17179869184 (E9) Unknown 0 0 46228 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12885 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12885 (F2) Unknown 0 0 21102	51.9% Above average	Read 417 Write 103 Mixed 145 48% 222 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 11 87% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 66.2 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 6.41 29% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 73%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38 10,520 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 174GB free Firmware: 3.AEG Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 87 71 190777777 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4395 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 39 (07) Seek error rate 61 58 1731368424346 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 47133 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1514 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 48 571801634 (C2) HDA temperature 34 52 55834574882 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 67 53 238646978 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 49 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29% Poor	Read 63.5 Write 37.6 Mixed 44.8 36% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.27 61% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 42%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 84GB free Firmware: 3.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 93 69 43723274 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9944 (05) Reallocated sector count 50 50 2024 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 463915499 (09) Power-on hours count 44 44 49752 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4567 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 168 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 46 504561694 (C2) HDA temperature 30 54 55834574878 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 38 118624171 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 3115 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 3115 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 138 2583 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 86 239 14	28.1% Poor	Read 94.6 Write 3.22 Mixed 44.3 36% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.37 87% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 36.3 111% 38.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 38.5 SC Mixed 28.6 86% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	651x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	291x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	218x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	277x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	190x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	181x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	85x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	80x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	73x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	170x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	98x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $459

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16