Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '18 at 11:26
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 38.7 2-Core 69.9 37% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 67.7 8-Core 68.8 9% 68.2 Pts	64-Core 70 4% 70 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset 16,152 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3048) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.58 Parallax 0.56 1% 0.61 fps	MRender 0.48 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.83 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11034 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1427 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 119 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 235477 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 65535 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	23.4% Poor	Read 226 Write 74.2 Mixed 15 22% 105 MB/s	4K Read 7.04 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 6.02 30% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 17.3 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 5.49 7% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 40GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 2.4 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	97x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	81x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	34x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	205x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	36x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	16x
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 52GBUnknownBench 33%, 46 samples	7x
ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 505 samples	7x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16