Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '18 at 13:38
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 84.5 38% 61 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 285 28% 227 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Lighting 46 Reflection 44.8 Parallax 40.6 38% 43.8 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 41.1 Splatting 37 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9294 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1341 (B1) Unknown 94 94 114 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 44 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 141 (EB) Unknown 99 99 22 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12839181898	83.5% Excellent	Read 506 Write 412 Mixed 207 83% 375 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 29.4 110% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 88.4 DQ Mixed 42.5 47% 79 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 115%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 252GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 151 150 5408 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7261 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28870 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7125 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 141 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7259 (C2) HDA temperature 114 87 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 183 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.1% Below average	Read 71.8 Write 60.8 Mixed 53.2 46% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.35 93% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 62%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 244GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 169 166 6508 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5136 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20276 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4564 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 108 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 134 134 198983 (C2) HDA temperature 114 92 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.4% Above average	Read 84.9 Write 94.3 Mixed 5.85 44% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.16 66% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FBD 1x8GB 748 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 17 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	56x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	34x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16