PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE III BLACK EDITION (all builds) |
Memory | 17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110302 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 12 '18 at 17:58 |
Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
Run User | SAU-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
76.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 520ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
32.3%
Below average
|
|||
45.5%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples | 14x |
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples | 11x |
Core i7 970Intel $1,141Bench 73%, 4,313 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 580Nvidia $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples | 8x |
GTX 480Nvidia $500Bench 20%, 3,874 samples | 4x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $1,423 |