Packard Easynote TE69BM

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard Easynote TE69BM (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard Easynote TE69BM
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 08:52
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2820-$139 2,102 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	29.5% Poor	Memory 52.9 1-Core 21.7 2-Core 39.7 27% 38.1 Pts	4-Core 38.4 8-Core 40.2 5% 39.3 Pts	64-Core 38.8 2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0845) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.89 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (64) Unknown 100 100 16560 (65) Unknown 100 100 3344 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 9 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 663 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 100 150324903971 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 30 (EA) Unknown 100 100 19 (F1) Unknown 100 100 29 (F2) Unknown 100 100 16 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	32.5% Below average	Read 243 Write 119 Mixed 115 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 7.35 46% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 66 DQ Write 32.6 DQ Mixed 18.6 22% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 82%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 465GB free Firmware: AM001J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1325 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1990 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 2156 (0A) Spinup retry count 139 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1233 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 268 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 10656 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 201864118299 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 95 95 2131 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 252 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	60.5% Good	Read 103 Write 108 Mixed 98.5 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.2 73% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GB 6,155 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Easynote TE69BM Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard Easynote TE69BM

CPU
Celeron N2820Intel $139Bench 27%, 2,102 samples	17x
Celeron N2920IntelBench 31%, 1,586 samples	16x
Pentium N3520IntelBench 34%, 2,090 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GBKingstonBench 61%, 337 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	7x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 7,765 samples	6x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16