Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 20:00
Run Duration	83 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 64.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 209 69% 126 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 838 74% 628 Pts	64-Core 2,338 145% 2,338 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 20.6 16% 18.5 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 20.2 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 868GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 361 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 19 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 65 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 654343787	102% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 399 Mixed 419 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 44 158% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 87.7 93% 156 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3003 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.1% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.2 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 18.8 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 122%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 148%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	104x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	83x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	60x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	30x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	22x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	29x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	14x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	16x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	7x
CMR16GX4M2A2666C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 731 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $874

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16