Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '18 at 00:37
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 78.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 218 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 853 77% 647 Pts	64-Core 1,226 76% 1,226 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2780 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 168 Reflection 188 Parallax 175 137% 177 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 176 Splatting 118 111% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 284GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6758 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1053 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 47 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 145 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17631175288	98.1% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 411 Mixed 420 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 41.9 155% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 37.6 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 82.6 72% 102 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 2,106 Write 1,026 Mixed 1,422 335% 1,518 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 47.6 191% 71.3 MB/s	DQ Read 43.3 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 31.3 54% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 59GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10219 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1511 (B1) Unknown 86 86 167 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 48 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 798 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19317164153	81% Excellent	Read 500 Write 348 Mixed 354 89% 401 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 23.8 120% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 37 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 65 59% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 118%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7021 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3478 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6357 (0A) Spinup retry count 169 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 653 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 6 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 189 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3706 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 223339020324 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 88 88 4963 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 206 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	60.8% Good	Read 103 Write 108 Mixed 107 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.22 97% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 390GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 64 86448704 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1546 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 115528795 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 -138212047580522 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 295 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 538378270 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1364 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4075 (C2) HDA temperature 30 41 55834574878 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -135514808119748 (F1) Unknown 100 253 20300958638 (F2) Unknown 100 253 39247309236	53.7% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 89.7 Mixed 88.2 69% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.21 73% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 89,024 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 30.7 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 33.3 SC Mixed 27 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16