HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '18 at 14:17
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 91.6 1-Core 135 2-Core 240 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 794 78% 639 Pts	64-Core 1,003 62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D9) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Lighting 36 Reflection 25.4 Parallax 31.2 29% 30.9 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 31.5 27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 85GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 26442300 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 -20289425499967 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1062 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 93 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 39 51542163480 (C2) HDA temperature 24 39 51542163480 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 26442300 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 26442300 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 26442300 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12113 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11581 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11581 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7597 (F4) Unknown 97 97 7536743	54.7% Above average	Read 440 Write 108 Mixed 153 50% 234 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 16.2 88% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 81.2 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 32 43% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 841GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 96 65536 (02) Throughput performance 142 100 70 (03) Spinup time 128 100 12896829615 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 12 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 100 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 12 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 6616 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 64 287113245 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 14 (C2) HDA temperature 206 166 154619936797 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	94.1% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 173 Mixed 168 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.22 84% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 107%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 10GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 119 Write 23.7 Mixed 49.7 66% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.11 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 1.17 101% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 1x8GB 5,278 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	42.7% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 11.3 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 12.5 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,236x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	717x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	588x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	736x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	357x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	289x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	353x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	172x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	157x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	394x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	219x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	178x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16