Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170915
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '18 at 21:33
Run Duration	414 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$78 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 223 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 656 67% 539 Pts	64-Core 834 52% 834 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.6% Above average	Lighting 61.8 Reflection 76.5 Parallax 82.4 50% 73.6 fps	MRender 89 Gravity 75.9 Splatting 86.7 69% 83.8 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 2,630 Write 377 Mixed 645 261% 1,218 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 2.86 90% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 99GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14485 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2672 (B1) Unknown 56 56 440 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 444 (F1) Unknown 99 99 50714285376	65.8% Good	Read 499 Write 134 Mixed 151 56% 261 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 10.3 98% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 28.6 73% 160 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 73%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 53GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4250099 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 48842368095045 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1009 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 411 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 41 38657392670 (C2) HDA temperature 30 41 38657392670 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4250099 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4250099 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4250099 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 103079215104 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2050 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2444 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2444 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2221 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3211274	78.5% Very good	Read 499 Write 244 Mixed 313 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 22.1 120% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 53.4 78% 141 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 84%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 45GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4651913 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 -60430189849787 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1009 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 412 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 40 42952294430 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 42952294430 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4651913 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4651913 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4651913 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 115964116992 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2085 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1309 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1309 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2807 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3407881	78.5% Very good	Read 512 Write 236 Mixed 271 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 19.9 117% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 14.2 65% 144 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 248GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 83 92358564 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4914 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 38840053952 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12689 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2591 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 5027 (BC) Unknown 100 98 17180131383 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 53 605290531 (C2) HDA temperature 35 47 17179869219 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 20 92358564 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 433 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 64523293709037 (F1) Unknown 100 253 528051664 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3357768743	46.2% Average	Read 68.5 Write 92.5 Mixed 59.4 55% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.3 81% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 3.5TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 42.4 Write 42.9 Mixed 14.4 40% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 0.28 130% 4.58 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 75%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 7GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 109 Write 4.55 Mixed 7.2 30% 40.1 MB/s	4K Read 9.43 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.002 35% 3.15 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.9% Good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 22.5 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 17.8 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	521x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	256x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	242x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	282x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	173x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	153x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	41x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	41x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	20x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 3,272 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $887

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16