Asus P7H55-M/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	11.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '18 at 17:30
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 77.7 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 136 58% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 249 29% 225 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Lighting 70.8 Reflection 70 Parallax 62.9 58% 67.9 fps	MRender 73.8 Gravity 64.6 Splatting 56.1 52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4122 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 903 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 30 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25018469313	41.8% Average	Read 263 Write 144 Mixed 171 42% 193 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 12.8 68% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.8 DQ Write 89.5 DQ Mixed 12.1 22% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 194GB free Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5911 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1842 (B1) Unknown 86 86 167 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 523 (F1) Unknown 99 99 38812632525	50.4% Above average	Read 263 Write 251 Mixed 206 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 12 71% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 65.4 DQ Mixed 31.1 38% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 85%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 170 6216 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 970 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4035 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 848 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 27 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9356 (C2) HDA temperature 121 106 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	78.5% Very good	Read 147 Write 126 Mixed 119 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.26 89% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11.2 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M/USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	44x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	27x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	11x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	10x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	5x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	76x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16