Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '18 at 16:26
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 89.2 1-Core 119 2-Core 240 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 955 85% 717 Pts	64-Core 1325 82% 1325 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0517) CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Lighting 80.4 Reflection 73.4 Parallax 105 66% 86.2 fps	MRender 73.5 Gravity 76 Splatting 61.2 57% 70.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 994 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 345 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 54 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 88 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5318898861	107% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 414 Mixed 424 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 44.5 161% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 105 118% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 164638720 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5030 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 12901366866 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7501 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2336 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 8591769637 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 50 336592916 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 424 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 82 82 37768 (C2) HDA temperature 20 50 17179869204 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -7318624268428 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13698969896 (F2) Unknown 100 253 36917735104	94.3% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 160 Mixed 142 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.2 87% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 2,692 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3334 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	MC Read 47.7 MC Write 45.1 MC Mixed 39.7 126% 44.2 GB/s	SC Read 28.6 SC Write 45.2 SC Mixed 35.3 104% 36.4 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)