Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '18 at 18:52
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 5.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 98.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
81% 138 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 539
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 74.8
41% 69.5 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 64.7
57% 70.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
214GB free
Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,419
Write 948
Mixed 1,009
249% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 59.1
241% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 35.1
130% 293 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 207%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 528
Write 482
Mixed 496
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 30.6
119% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 20.5
94% 212 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Ocz-vert OCZ-VERTEX2 3.5 90GB
84GB free
Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 148
Write 70.9
Mixed 98.2
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 12
84% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 23.6
22% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 39%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
407GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 98.4
Write 71.3
Mixed 78.9
62% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.16
41% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
229GB free
Firmware: 07.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 116
Write 103
Mixed 91.8
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 62%
Freecom Mobile Drive XXS 250GB
10GB free, PID fc88
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 27.8
Mixed 29.8
38% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.14
43% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 24.1
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 44.5
90% 44.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UD5H Builds (Compare 1,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $864
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback