Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime18.4 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 08:17
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 239
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 616
64% 512 Pts
64-Core 655
40% 655 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2977) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 64.2
55% 67.9 fps
MRender 75.4
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 61.3
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
92GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 471
Write 253
Mixed 130
62% 285 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 11.2
88% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 29.7
74% 158 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 88%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
28GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 412
Mixed 423
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 49.9
183% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 133
146% 248 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 116%
Great: 131%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 142
Write 104
Mixed 135
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
60% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback