Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '18 at 14:04
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 177 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 349 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54% Above average	Lighting 67.4 Reflection 70.4 Parallax 62.9 55% 66.9 fps	MRender 74.8 Gravity 64.3 Splatting 56.4 52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 787GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 51 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 138 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 10 (B4) Unknown 0 0 38 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 53 201863462948 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1515716048 (F7) Unknown 100 100 24998400 (F8) Unknown 100 100 29571377	52.3% Above average	Read 266 Write 210 Mixed 219 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 17.4 80% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 67.4 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 17.3 40% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 125%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2GB free Firmware: 2.11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 2957981 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (09) Power-on hours count 33 33 -25314537183653 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1018 (AB) Unknown 0 0 6 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 212 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 6 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2957981 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 6 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2957981 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2957981 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 19273 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8181 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8181 (F2) Unknown 0 0 24047	45.4% Average	Read 360 Write 118 Mixed 130 44% 203 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 10.1 64% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 93.7 DQ Mixed 9.17 37% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 82%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 0GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16405 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 683 (B1) Unknown 96 96 80 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 50 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 132 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21053300749	65.4% Good	Read 356 Write 200 Mixed 242 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 30 104% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 18.1 48% 104 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 526GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 112 105 7375 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5614 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 38867 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 976 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 359 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 67 67 400774 (C2) HDA temperature 116 106 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.6% Below average	Read 36 Write 70.9 Mixed 65 44% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.14 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 0.17 36% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 526GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 108 100 7600 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3481 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 33632 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 977 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 301 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 131 131 209583 (C2) HDA temperature 114 107 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.4% Below average	Read 49.9 Write 73.5 Mixed 49.4 43% 57.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.19 4K Write 0.53 4K Mixed 0.15 35% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB 9,947 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.2% Below average	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 10.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	160x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	152x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	22x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16