Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180307
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '18 at 13:08
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 79 1-Core 134 2-Core 268 87% 160 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 862 82% 679 Pts	64-Core 1,106 68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3303) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 118 Parallax 104 93% 112 fps	MRender 99.6 Gravity 107 Splatting 107 86% 104 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 85 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 104 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (B4) Unknown 0 0 81 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 45 236223201317 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3573436853 (F7) Unknown 100 100 57262974 (F8) Unknown 100 100 55070557
Poor: 83% Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 65536 (02) Throughput performance 144 144 82 (03) Spinup time 162 162 34383724857 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 26186 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 28454 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 10459 (C0) Power-off retract count 77 77 28324 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 77 77 28324 (C2) HDA temperature 240 240 158914904089 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.7% Very good	Read 134 Write 134 Mixed 132 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 88%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65 1,900 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 234 4208 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1682 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6345 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1650 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 155 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1817 (C2) HDA temperature 127 112 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.8% Above average	Read 91.1 Write 99.6 Mixed 87.3 70% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.26 102% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 750GB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 101 87 99947055 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 75 75 26613 (05) Reallocated sector count 62 51 50408 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 4642545990 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 35813 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 88 88 12303 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 399 (BC) Unknown 100 99 42950393869 (BD) vendor-specific 63 63 37 (BE) vendor-specific 76 61 21878997016 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 158 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 59 59 83966 (C2) HDA temperature 24 40 -140737488355304 (C5) Current pending sector count 12 1 14544 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 12 1 14544 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -110578227986152 (F1) Unknown 100 253 140416242787689 (F2) Unknown 100 253 113090575520839	90.3% Outstanding	Read 154 Write 161 Mixed 156 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.39 102% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 114%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 446GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 177 5541 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7685 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 10057 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2541 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 72 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17154 (C2) HDA temperature 126 113 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	65.6% Good	Read 135 Write 93.7 Mixed 98.5 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.18 77% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 313GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 162 162 34382741861 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 25955 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 22389 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 10437 (C0) Power-off retract count 77 77 28202 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 77 77 28202 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 193274576922 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.6% Good	Read 107 Write 104 Mixed 97.7 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.23 108% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4A2666C16 4x8GB 582 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	MC Read 24 MC Write 48.9 MC Mixed 24.4 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 10.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16