Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180212
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '18 at 20:35
Run Duration	321 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 72.8 1-Core 119 2-Core 240 78% 144 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 760 74% 607 Pts	64-Core 946 58% 946 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1328 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.9% Average	Lighting 60.7 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 76.5 50% 68.8 fps	MRender 63.8 Gravity 57.8 Splatting 55.3 48% 59 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135 28,136 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 742 Write 359 Mixed 351 106% 484 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 16.6 102% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 44 78% 158 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 144%
PNY SSD2SC120G1CS1754D117-551 120GB 2,096 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 5GB free Firmware: CS111101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3107 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 817 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 76 (B1) Unknown 0 0 143 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 100 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 78984 (C4) Reallocation count 98 98 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 42 (E7) Temperature 99 100 35 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2 (EA) Unknown 0 0 111 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8283 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13450	80.9% Excellent	Read 427 Write 296 Mixed 345 79% 356 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 70.8 4K Mixed 32.2 117% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 65.2 91% 169 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3.5TB free Firmware: 9401 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 130 Write 133 Mixed 94.3 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 4.62 4K Write 5.62 4K Mixed 0.55 358% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 242335864 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2014 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 10672444 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2199 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 110 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 131074 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 49 504954909 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 12572 (C2) HDA temperature 29 51 55834574877 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -40681930226965 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7247709642 (F2) Unknown 100 253 66147733804	82.2% Excellent	Read 154 Write 132 Mixed 145 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.17 68% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 114%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB 12,134 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 13GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	27% Poor	Read 148 Write 11.7 Mixed 52.9 67% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.32 4K Write 0.64 4K Mixed 1.11 76% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 86%
USB Flash Drive 16GB 1,242 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5598 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 18.6 Write 8.91 Mixed 9.26 14% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.26 4K Write 3.12 4K Mixed 1.16 161% 2.85 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 14,957 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	80.9% Excellent	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 27.2 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.2 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 95 42% 95 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)