Toshiba Satellite L70-A-K5S

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite L70-A-K5S (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '18 at 11:13
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3380M 2,989 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 93 2-Core 165 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 231 31% 230 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA88) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.13% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 7.23 Parallax 3.16 4% 5 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 8.7 5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250 8,417 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: L2010420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 96 96 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9582 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 942 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 51 (AF) Unknown 100 100 30066410071 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 68 537788448 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 51 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 32 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 166502 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 56 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 288 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 166502 (F2) Unknown 100 100 230656	60.7% Good	Read 360 Write 289 Mixed 204 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 17.1 86% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32.3 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 18.4 29% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 95%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125 23,438 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 258GB free Firmware: JA2OA560 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 168 168 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4143 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 13116 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1772 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 73 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 69 69 314840 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 197569085466 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	42.3% Average	Read 77.6 Write 69.7 Mixed 14.2 39% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.17 57% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GB 3,420 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.9 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 16.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite L70-A-K5S Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Toshiba Satellite L70-A-K5S

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	1x

RAM
M471773DH0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-YK0 6GBSamsungBench 35%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba Satellite L70-A-K5S

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Toshiba Satellite L70-A-K5S

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)