Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime15.5 Days
Run DateMar 29 '18 at 12:18
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 139
58% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 403
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2673) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29.1% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 41.8
27% 36.5 fps
MRender 47.8
Gravity 38
Splatting 35.4
32% 40.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 494
Write 280
Mixed 323
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 18.2
74% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 40.6
50% 90 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 86%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
138GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 83.4
Write 78.6
Mixed 86
62% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.43
122% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
96GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 83.2
Write 85.1
Mixed 108
70% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.27
70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
91GB free
Firmware: SM12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 76.1
Write 68.4
Mixed 71.6
54% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.18
71% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback