Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics9.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 08 '14 at 01:01
Run Duration743 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 127
43% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 343
37% 292 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 51% Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
Gigabyte(1458 21D5) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.52% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 9.91
10% 10.7 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 11.4
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.52%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 498
Write 395
Mixed 435
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 23.1
96% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 68.2
70% 116 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
667GB free
Firmware: ML6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 105
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.3
75% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
98GB free
Firmware: ML6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 66.9
Write 51.2
Mixed 77.4
50% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.18
50% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
66GB free
Firmware: MN6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79% Very good
Read 130
Write 146
Mixed 111
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.29
76% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
159GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 68.5
Write 5.65
Mixed 10.3
24% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.28
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 33%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
110GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.1% Poor
Read 63.3
Write 60.4
Mixed 11.4
52% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.35
54% 0.71 MB/s
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
96GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
Read 69.4
Write 65.5
Mixed 15.6
59% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.34
54% 0.73 MB/s
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
35GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
Read 58.7
Write 62.6
Mixed 5.98
50% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.35
54% 0.7 MB/s
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 5000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Read 31
Write 16.2
Mixed 17.7
25% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.44
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.007
17% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 34%
SDHC Card 8GB
2GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Read 14
Write 4.22
Mixed 6.37
9% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.07
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 13%
Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback