Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 11 '18 at 00:51
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-950-$300
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.6% Above average
SC Int 71.5
SC Float 77.7
SC Mixed 74.3
60% 74.5 Pts
QC Int 230
QC Float 253
QC Mixed 242
55% 242 Pts
MC Int 349
MC Float 391
MC Mixed 379
56% 373 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 3778) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 52.6
Parallax 68.5
19% 59.3 fps
MRender 55.9
Gravity 80.9
Splatting 53
28% 63.3 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$136
95GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 371
Write 187
Mixed 234
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 25.8
110% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 50.8
65% 118 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 116%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$98
148GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 72.2
Write 94.1
Mixed 72.6
60% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.17
69% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 66%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$72
122GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 54.3
Mixed 61.7
47% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.17
65% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 60%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
16GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 74.9
Mixed 45.2
46% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.13
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 40%
Great: 83%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$77
3GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 114
Write 119
Mixed 106
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.18
77% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 16.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 74%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 2,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $760
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $136
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $176AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $193SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback