Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5430 1,961 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	49% Average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 38 2-Core 75.9 41% 62.2 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 151 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Palit(1569 0F00) 1GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 3.66 4% 4.67 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 3.48 4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB 7,100 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 184 184 552782 (03) Spinup time 154 152 3258 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6964 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19657 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4791 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2227 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6962 (C2) HDA temperature 105 98 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 173 173 1441 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	55.8% Above average	Read 95.9 Write 98.5 Mixed 31.8 55% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.38 100% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MK8032GAX 80GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 28GB free, PID 8818 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 20.1 Write 23 Mixed 9.52 22% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.27 48% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	3x
Pentium Dual E2180Intel $130Bench 33%, 7,312 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 7300 SENvidiaBench 0%, 1,208 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x

SSD
335 Series 240GBIntel $219Bench 77%, 4,220 samples	1x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x
SSDNow KC300 240GBKingston $81Bench 78%, 2,054 samples	1x

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $389

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16