EVGA 152-HR-E979

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	EVGA 152-HR-E979 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '18 at 21:32
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 78 1-Core 106 2-Core 209 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 330 40% 306 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1621 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 8.97 Reflection 71.7 Parallax 69.3 7% 50 fps	Splatting 57.1 59% 57.1 fps
Poor: 43% Great: 54%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 28116701 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 -51462298137589 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 908 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 109 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 37 41 73017131045 (C2) HDA temperature 37 41 73017131045 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 28116701 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 28116701 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 28116701 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 55834574849 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6802 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4098 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4098 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5026 (F4) Unknown 99 99 5373995	43.2% Average	Read 221 Write 126 Mixed 161 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 14.1 74% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 79.6 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 32.3 45% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 7 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 152-HR-E979 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 152-HR-E979

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	63x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	5x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	23x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	7x
CS90 0 500GB SSDPNYBench 63%, 102 samples	4x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 9,944 samples	13x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 27%, 2,515 samples	8x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 59%, 546 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16