Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Dell Precision T3610
Motherboard	Dell Precision T3610 (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180205
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '18 at 21:49
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 198 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 288 37% 280 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Lighting 76.1 Reflection 75.9 Parallax 66.5 62% 72.8 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 71.9 58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2118 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1728 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 62 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 104 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10384918605	97% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 396 Mixed 404 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 38.6 135% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 64.4 99% 190 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 134%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 121 9866 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4721 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27329 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3085 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 326 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4394 (C2) HDA temperature 109 96 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	75.6% Very good	Read 142 Write 121 Mixed 128 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.51 142% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 93%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235 6,443 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 100 (03) Spinup time 164 164 38681117073 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3206 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 17 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2412 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1774 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3244 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3244 (C2) HDA temperature 139 139 236224577579 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	79.8% Very good	Read 139 Write 138 Mixed 128 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 3.64 4K Mixed 0.4 152% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 8x4GB 240 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.3% Good	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 20.4 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 8.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	942x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	560x
Xeon E5-1607 v2IntelBench 65%, 1,768 samples	246x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	236x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	93x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	51x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	167x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	142x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16