Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161021
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '18 at 14:29
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 125 2-Core 259 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 510 68% 507 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 854E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1552 MHz, MLim: 1837 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Lighting 47.7 Reflection 46.7 Parallax 41.3 39% 45.2 fps	MRender 41.9 Gravity 41.9 Splatting 38 33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4294 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1449 (B1) Unknown 97 97 56 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 47 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 216 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29993564795	88.6% Excellent	Read 495 Write 404 Mixed 417 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 20.1 129% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 45 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 102 93% 135 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 93000736 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3166 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 314807379 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13543 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1710 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4 (BD) vendor-specific 89 89 11 (BE) vendor-specific 68 53 554696736 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 120 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 14624 (C2) HDA temperature 32 47 38654705696 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 94549410066378 (F1) Unknown 100 253 52577117037 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1044463388380	108% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 178 Mixed 171 137% 183 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.26 102% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 626GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 67 (03) Spinup time 120 120 12897288384 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2237 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 108 108 37 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3010 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 814 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2237 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2237 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 188979281953 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 34	97.3% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 172 Mixed 158 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.2 89% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	62.8% Good	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 18.3 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 21.3 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	458x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	222x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	299x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	172x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	59x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16