Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 02 '18 at 06:08
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 141 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 421 41% 337 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Lighting 115 Reflection 115 Parallax 98 94% 109 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 99.2 Splatting 97.6 80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 631GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12299 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1552 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 57 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 90 (F1) Unknown 99 99 31759605469	58% Above average	Read 490 Write 112 Mixed 145 54% 249 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 17.7 101% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 37.7 DQ Write 50.7 DQ Mixed 51.7 37% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1724 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 288 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 60 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 20 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7074153781	64.3% Good	Read 373 Write 266 Mixed 290 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 24.4 103% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 34.5 DQ Write 52.5 DQ Mixed 19.5 22% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 133%
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 101GB free Firmware: CXM02W1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22561 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5579 (B1) Unknown 84 84 576 (B3) Unknown 95 95 196 (B4) Unknown 95 95 3836 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 47 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1664 (F1) Unknown 99 99 63222980880	58.3% Above average	Read 475 Write 282 Mixed 376 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 12 68% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 76.7 DQ Mixed 12.2 20% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 73%
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2GB free Firmware: CXM02W1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 26192 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6015 (B1) Unknown 86 86 494 (B3) Unknown 95 95 190 (B4) Unknown 95 95 3842 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 43 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1417 (F1) Unknown 99 99 57050573143	39.8% Below average	Read 440 Write 127 Mixed 185 54% 251 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 7.07 46% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 18.8 DQ Write 33.8 DQ Mixed 8.29 11% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 928GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 95 178396295 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14805 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 14 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 70885666 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23185 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 37 5958 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 83 83 17 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032834 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 50 487915548 (C2) HDA temperature 28 50 25769803804 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 22 18 178396295 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 12 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 12 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -86320252674541 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4024339785 (F2) Unknown 100 253 748207276	57% Above average	Read 113 Write 85.4 Mixed 97.6 74% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.53 110% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 43,127 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.7% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11.6 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16