Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180409
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 04 '18 at 16:18
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Memory 94.4 1-Core 140 2-Core 277 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 852 86% 698 Pts	64-Core 1,110 69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32% Below average	Lighting 40 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 37.7 33% 36.4 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 36.3 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 60945 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1824 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 731 (64) Unknown 100 100 9750912 (65) Unknown 100 100 1464640 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 41 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 97 97 1437 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2679 (B7) Unknown 96 96 17 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 38 100 210454380582 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 60945 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 60945 (E7) Temperature 96 96 4 (E9) Unknown 100 100 17383 (EA) Unknown 100 100 8067 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10462 (F2) Unknown 100 100 12876 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 60945	69.8% Good	Read 490 Write 259 Mixed 262 74% 337 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 12 85% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 31.6 76% 162 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 92%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 189 (03) Spinup time 184 174 7791 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4674 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 57 (07) Seek error rate 200 199 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4804 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2080 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 119 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 179 179 63171 (C2) HDA temperature 113 98 39 (C4) Reallocation count 143 143 57 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 62	58.2% Above average	Read 115 Write 87.3 Mixed 117 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.16 67% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 184 175 5766 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12560 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15843 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4291 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 344 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 132 132 206307 (C2) HDA temperature 113 94 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 19 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67% Good	Read 110 Write 124 Mixed 92.2 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.22 77% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 513GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 101 80 10864 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14845 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 77346654678 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13832 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5137 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 6442 (BC) Unknown 100 40 21475164309 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 41 644867948581 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1131 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 17838 (C2) HDA temperature 37 59 -140737488355291 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 14 12 10864 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 93 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 93 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -139826955273874 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1019597738 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3726175681	56% Above average	Read 92.7 Write 103 Mixed 89.3 71% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 0.82 4K Mixed 0.53 86% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 320GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 7 (03) Spinup time 179 168 4025 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9842 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11086 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3538 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 254 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 174 174 79398 (C2) HDA temperature 111 96 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 2	73.7% Very good	Read 132 Write 124 Mixed 104 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.19 82% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 84%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 94.7 Write 84.8 Mixed 29.9 82% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.45 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.09 42% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 105 Write 86.6 Mixed 67.5 106% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.06 46% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$207 4,097 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.4% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 14.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 58.8 68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	676x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	302x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	196x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	146x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	145x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	132x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	50x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	84x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $709

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16