Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '14 at 12:22
Run Duration	448 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 95.5 2-Core 189 65% 142 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 346 47% 350 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 50% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435 6,727 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Asus(1043 3003) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Lighting 48.1 Reflection 34 Parallax 62.1 39% 48.1 fps	MRender 32.9 Gravity 53.2 Splatting 43.1 36% 43.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 178997936 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1912 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 67238779 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15337 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 905 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 48 707199017 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 396 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 71 71 59588 (C2) HDA temperature 41 52 38654705705 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -105535936387094 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4183516329379 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3636481155831	1.89% Terrible	Read 3.18 Write 3.04 Mixed 2.86 2% 3.03 MB/s	4K Read 0.11 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.25 53% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 114%
Hitachi Touro Mobile 3.0 1TB 925 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 128GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 25.3 Write 26.6 Mixed 28.5 20% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.18 62% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 121GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 230324101 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7530 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 338095285 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23555 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2594 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 92 92 8 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 78 2018665431539 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 52 538968096 (C2) HDA temperature 32 48 21474836512 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 41 25 230324101 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 194 64574 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -136940737234173 (F1) Unknown 100 253 798795078 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3480343696	38.9% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 67.6 Mixed 44.2 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.31 83% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	387x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	205x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	131x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)