Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '18 at 00:20
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 133
62% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 320
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 906 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 37.2
24% 31.5 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 53.2
46% 56.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43
93GB free
Firmware: M2CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 513
Write 369
Mixed 403
95% 429 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 26.7
88% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 76.6
DQ Mixed 45.6
48% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 114%
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 447
Write 412
Mixed 442
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 11.9
89% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 19.3
38% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
257GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 156
Write 125
Mixed 121
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.26
93% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.3
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback