Asus P5Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '18 at 04:31
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon E5450-$220
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.2% Below average
SC Int 64.6
SC Float 38.8
SC Mixed 51.2
41% 51.5 Pts
QC Int 266
QC Float 153
QC Mixed 200
47% 206 Pts
MC Int 257
MC Float 162
MC Mixed 208
32% 209 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.4.3
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 81.8
Reflection 76.2
Parallax 104
28% 87.4 fps
MRender 54.4
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 78.9
27% 66 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0624AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.4% Below average
Read 214
Write 123
Mixed 119
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 10.9
65% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 39.5
DQ Mixed 11.9
16% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 96%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$129
67GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 103
Mixed 22.3
52% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.26
96% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $95
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $114
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $898SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $167SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback