| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar B350ET2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180209 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | May 21 '18 at 10:28 |
| Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.1%
Good
|
61% 107 Pts
|
45% 349 Pts
|
26% 427 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280X-$500
PowerColor(148C 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.8%
Below average
|
33% 39.3 fps
|
27% 32.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
104% 138 MB/s
|
107% 1.22 MB/s
| |
|
|
||||
|
|
44.2%
Average
|
54% 72.5 MB/s
|
72% 0.84 MB/s
| |
|
|
39.5%
Below average
|
52% 68.6 MB/s
|
24% 0.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown IM48GU88N24-FFFHM CL15-15-15 D4-2133 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
73.6%
Very good
|
79% 27.6 GB/s
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B350ET2 Builds (Compare 64 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar B350ET2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 9x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 8x |
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 10x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 10x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $217 |