Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 23 '18 at 19:08
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 131 2-Core 269 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 517 60% 464 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2742 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Lighting 202 Reflection 212 Parallax 214 164% 209 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 189 Splatting 146 127% 156 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 931GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 424 Write 223 Mixed 274 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 2.18 40% 9.29 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 99%
Crucial M500 480GB-$84 9,168 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1272 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1975 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 93 (AE) Unknown 100 100 80 (B4) Unknown 0 0 8219 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 59 176093659163 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 28162712667 (F7) Unknown 100 100 888491452 (F8) Unknown 100 100 2050229843	84.2% Excellent	Read 482 Write 410 Mixed 434 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 15.9 99% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 15.1 77% 172 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35 38,490 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.2% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 19.8 66% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 20.8 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	108x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $940

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16