Lenovo 2325SW9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2325SW9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325SW9
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 76
1-Core 49.3
2-Core 89.5
47% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 124
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 439
Write 131
Mixed 216
57% 262 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 9.31
54% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 79.5
DQ Mixed 57.9
56% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
6GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 13.4
Mixed 18.4
24% 21 MB/s
4K Read 3.35
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 1.29
124% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback