MSI Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B47
MotherboardMSI Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170912
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 06 '18 at 18:26
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 758
80% 640 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.5% Very good
Lighting 97.9
Reflection 112
Parallax 95.7
80% 102 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 94.6
Splatting 97.4
79% 96 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 88%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7B47) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Lighting 8.17
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 8.31
7% 9.4 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 16.4
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 392
Mixed 421
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 40.6
141% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 83.1
114% 211 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 101%
Great: 123%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
961GB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 92.2
Mixed 98
71% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.19
77% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
294GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 68.7
Write 76.2
Mixed 75.1
55% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.19
77% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
65GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 58.1
Mixed 51
42% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.25
40% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 100
Mixed 91.3
72% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.28
91% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3000-MR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 27.4
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 27.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 92%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47) Builds (Compare 2,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $672
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback