Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110718
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '18 at 20:29
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 60.8 2-Core 121 55% 88 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 355 37% 298 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Lighting 47.2 Reflection 34 Parallax 63 38% 48.1 fps	MRender 32 Gravity 43.1 Splatting 41.9 32% 39 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 83GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -7327213304524 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1142 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1142 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1142 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 76951 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 88 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 76951 (F2) Unknown 100 100 585588 (F9) Unknown 100 100 2566	55.6% Above average	Read 271 Write 242 Mixed 223 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 13.3 94% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 95.8 DQ Mixed 14.4 25% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5202 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 671 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 43 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7042027403	56.5% Above average	Read 274 Write 289 Mixed 243 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 17.5 87% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 30.6 DQ Write 58.8 DQ Mixed 17.6 21% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 124%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 242GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 25 (03) Spinup time 176 170 4158 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2092 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11519 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2061 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 124 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1969 (C2) HDA temperature 115 104 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.8% Very good	Read 123 Write 127 Mixed 87.3 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.36 121% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBSR0 F3-10666CL9-4GBSR0 F3-10666CL9-4GBSR0 F3-10666CL9-4GBSR0 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 400, 400, 400, 400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.5% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 9.4 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	40x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $54Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples	6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16