| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | DEXP Mars E174 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MSI H110M PRO-VD Plus |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170518 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 13 '18 at 17:18 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.5%
Good
|
70% 124 Pts
|
44% 335 Pts
|
22% 357 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1708 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
|
33.3%
Below average
|
34% 37.5 fps
|
32% 38.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
78.8%
Very good
|
99% 132 MB/s
|
59% 0.59 MB/s
| |
|
|
74.4%
Very good
|
96% 128 MB/s
|
100% 0.85 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.6%
Below average
|
36% 12.4 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
48% 83.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Mars E174 Builds (Compare 5 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: DEXP Mars E174
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
| HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $169 |