| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
63.2%
Good
|
64% 110 Pts
|
47% 394 Pts
|
32% 508 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.3%
Poor
|
22% 27.7 fps
|
25% 31.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
53.3%
Above average
|
71% 94.3 MB/s
|
12% 0.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
44.1%
Average
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
32% 11 GB/s
|
44% 90.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,223 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Disqualified System: bin bin
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 2,020x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 1,564x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 931x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,322x |
| SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples | 1,139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 1,039x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |