Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '18 at 21:13
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 59 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 152 54% 95.8 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 216 28% 213 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.2% Very poor	Lighting 24 Reflection 19.5 Parallax 23.8 20% 22.4 fps	MRender 24.5 Gravity 22.3 Splatting 21.9 19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 60GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526C SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 53 50 47 45 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.2% Below average	Read 256 Write 59.7 Mixed 96.2 SusWrite 53 25% 116 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 17.8 68% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 70.6 DQ Mixed 85.2 69% 101 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 72%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 483GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 167 176 143 177 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 171 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 168 96% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB 7,794 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 11 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	148x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	131x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	120x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	55x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples	79x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBCorsairBench 68%, 7,803 samples	32x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GBCorsairBench 39%, 1,735 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $338

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16