MSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7845
MotherboardMSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130412
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '18 at 23:17
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 485
65% 485 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 122
Parallax 102
96% 114 fps
MRender 99.9
Gravity 107
Splatting 107
86% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 95 106 109 103 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 487
Mixed 367
SusWrite 140
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.7
206% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 236
212% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 118%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
245GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 87 86 85 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 70
Write 75.8
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 86.2
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 62 62 61 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 108
Write 97.7
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 60.3
67% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 59%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 181 184 182 180 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 190
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 182
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
182GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 96
Write 96
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 102
55% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
166GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 93 92 94 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 71.7
Write 70.7
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 92.6
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845) Builds (Compare 1,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845) - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $569
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback