Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 150%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 22:37
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700-$312
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
SC Int 127
SC Float 136
SC Mixed 130
105% 131 Pts
QC Int 474
QC Float 521
QC Mixed 506
113% 500 Pts
MC Int 956
MC Float 1,112
MC Mixed 1,052
155% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$260
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Lighting 221
Reflection 200
Parallax 214
68% 211 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 207
Splatting 161
74% 172 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$298
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2029 1833 1366 1152 1148 1156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,476
Write 2,214
Mixed 1,466
SusWrite 1,447
426% 1,901 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 76.7
256% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,239
DQ Write 1,024
DQ Mixed 1,121
842% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 203%
This bench: 317%
Great: 350%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$175
546GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 141 137 142 145 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 126
Write 144
Mixed 72
SusWrite 141
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
195% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77%
Great: 115%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$220
49GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 78 73 80 84 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 110
Write 95.8
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 80.7
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$63
395GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 109 94 112 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 103
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 84%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$113
165GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 119 115 116 113 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 147
Write 134
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 120
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
70.1% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 117%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $864
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $899SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback