Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Master SLI (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180704
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '18 at 19:45
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 71.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 250 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 731 76% 609 Pts	64-Core 1141 71% 1141 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.8% Very good	Lighting 99.2 Reflection 110 Parallax 93 81% 101 fps	MRender 94 Gravity 92.9 Splatting 97 78% 94.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 440 392 246 262 268 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 405 Write 425 Mixed 361 SusWrite 338 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 41.4 146% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 192 144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 36GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 60 55 56 64 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 464 Write 434 Mixed 172 SusWrite 59.7 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 21.7 114% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 68.2 84% 156 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 931GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 446 456 460 469 476 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 444 Write 436 Mixed 370 SusWrite 455 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 52.6 174% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 373 280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.8% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 23 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	18x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	8x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	11x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	9x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	9x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $557

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16