Gigabyte GA-X7V4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X7V4  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '18 at 04:18
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5850HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 88
2-Core 162
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 463
48% 385 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Gigabyte(1458 1759) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 26.2
15% 26.6 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 33.8
22% 25.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend MSA370 mSATA 256GB-$189
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 252 265 269 287 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 407
Write 274
Mixed 241
SusWrite 268
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 31.4
93% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 176
154% 230 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
351GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 300 307 334 373 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 408
Write 404
Mixed 338
SusWrite 329
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 27
105% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
264% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 134%
Liteonit LMS-32L6M mSATA 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: DM5110E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 84 85 82 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 379
Write 87
Mixed 123
SusWrite 84.2
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 21
76% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 87.6
DQ Mixed 104
84% 122 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%
Transcend MSA370 mSATA 256GB-$189
191GB free
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 259 270 278 291 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 399
Write 293
Mixed 260
SusWrite 273
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 23.7
91% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 177
159% 239 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 91%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 2TB
607GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 96 95 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 80.4
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 94.6
65% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 27.8
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 19.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X7V4 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X7V4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback