PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H81M-HDS (all builds) |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130909 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 17 '18 at 07:11 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 45% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
64.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0468) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 185 135 120 109 106 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 143 77 77 77 77 MB/s
|
42.8%
Average
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 3TB
588GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 35 37 37 37 MB/s
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 173x |
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 158x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 100x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 133x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 74x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 57x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $325 |