Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '18 at 11:21
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 187
78% 131 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 680
69% 557 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 39.8
35% 38.7 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 38.8
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 432 435 436 436 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 432
Mixed 421
SusWrite 434
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 46.5
154% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 272
226% 326 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 110%
Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
911GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 188 191 190 193 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 188
Mixed 36
SusWrite 191
110% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 111%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 9.2 17 14 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 134
Write 95.7
Mixed 102
SusWrite 27.1
113% 90 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.1
272% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $528
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback