| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110304 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 17 '18 at 22:30 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
76%
Very good
|
73% 124 Pts
|
47% 351 Pts
|
22% 353 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
22.8%
Poor
|
22% 28.3 fps
|
24% 30.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 67 64 60 53 50 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
26% 117 MB/s
|
78% 29.5 MB/s
|
28% 46.9 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
177GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 118 116 114 120 MB/s
|
64.3%
Good
|
72% 98.1 MB/s
|
144% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HM100UI 1TB-$47
259GB free
Firmware: 2AM10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 69 66 61 54 50 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
35% 48.1 MB/s
|
141% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
53.3%
Above average
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
63% 63.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $196Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 156x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 120x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 116x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 73x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 48x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 45x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $224 |