Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '18 at 21:02
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 77.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 224 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 889 79% 668 Pts	64-Core 1,209 75% 1,209 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 148 Parallax 127 118% 140 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 135 Splatting 109 97% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2139 701 620 612 622 624 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 2,512 Write 2,297 Mixed 1,613 SusWrite 886 408% 1,827 MB/s	4K Read 59.8 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 77.8 255% 86.7 MB/s	DQ Read 992 DQ Write 714 DQ Mixed 899 659% 868 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 340%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 73GB free Firmware: 2CV102HA SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 73 82 82 79 81 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 251 Write 82 Mixed 114 SusWrite 79.5 29% 132 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 11.8 82% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 79.4 69% 103 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 44%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 201GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 296 295 295 295 295 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 485 Mixed 393 SusWrite 315 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 58.6 197% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 332 258% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 132GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 50 42 60 58 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 60.5 Write 60.5 Mixed 38 SusWrite 51.3 39% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 117 118 116 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 104 Write 111 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 116 62% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 88% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 7,253 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (88^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	103% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 35.1 107% 37.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 39.1 SC Mixed 30.3 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)