PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110608 |
Uptime | 98 Days |
Run Date | Jul 20 '18 at 18:55 |
Run Duration | 181 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
69.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 88 85 88 85 86 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
112GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 33 33 33 33 MB/s
|
23.2%
Poor
|
|||
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 500GB
205GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 9.9 9.9 9.4 9.4 MB/s
|
7.41%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 160x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 152x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 36x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $516 |