Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180508
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJul 21 '18 at 08:55
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 258
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 887
84% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
Asus(1043 04DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1090 MHz, MLim: 1505 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.7% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 101
63% 81.1 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 83.7
59% 70.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
38GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 352 283 227 193 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 493
Write 385
Mixed 288
SusWrite 269
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 28.6
110% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 156
126% 184 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 86%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
55GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 269 156 273 283 283 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 490
Write 148
Mixed 253
SusWrite 262
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 29.1
111% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 154
123% 178 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 86%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,113
Write 1,322
Mixed 581
293% 1,338 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 57.3
252% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 1,092
DQ Mixed 915
731% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 83 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 81.5
Write 85.3
Mixed 60
SusWrite 80.4
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback