Asrock A88M-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A88M-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '18 at 08:09
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 122
55% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 193
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 31
21% 28.4 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 32.8
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 192 182 172 159 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 410
Write 277
Mixed 324
SusWrite 199
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 40.8
128% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 172
124% 158 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 124%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
306GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.5
Write 32.8
Mixed 25.3
38% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 21%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB
0GB free, PID 070e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 0.3
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 1.1
2% 2.63 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 10%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 2GB
2GB free, PID 070e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 8.9 9.6 10 9.1 9.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 7
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 9
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.7
91% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 2400 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 18.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88M-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A88M-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $175
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $261Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback